When comparing Carly Fiorina
articles on Politico (liberal) and Fox News (conservative) I found that the
Politico article focused more on the fact that she has never held a political
position in any major forms of government. Although, they did give her the
benefit of the doubt and pull examples from actions shown throughout her 2010
California campaign against Barbara Boxer. Politico also focused on the
“tumultuous tenure” at the company, Hewlett-Packard. The big-ticket issue
within this statement was the fact that Carly was politically fighting for more
creation of jobs but during her time at HP fired over 30,000 employees.
Throughout the remainder of this article Carly was portrayed economically and
politically irresponsible. Issues praised were Carly’s fight for the “war on
women” and her ability to empathize with people due to her past cancer
diagnoses.
Based on the research I have done
on Carly Fiorina, I believe both article are extreme representations of certain
aspects of Carly’s experiences and potential. I believe that parts of the
Politico article could accurately be used to represent Carly’s potential,
because of her lack of experience in office. Although Politico uses this idea
as their main argument against Carly, she has provided positive examples of
leadership throughout her years leading up to this campaign. On the other hand,
I believe that the Fox News article over glorifies Carly’s time at HP. As I do
agree with Carly’s great potential for 2016, I think that Politico’s example of
Carly’s mass employment reduction brings up important contradiction in her
campaign.
The fact that Fox News praises her
so adamantly about her time at HP fails to recognize the other important
aspects of her campaign and message. As in the many social issues Carly has
focused on bettering throughout her candidacy, if elected. These issues such as
women’s rights, gay rights and the overall economy, are never discussed
throughout the article. I do understand that certain article talk about certain
issues but given the title of the article, “Carly Fiorina: Why
ex-CEO could give Hillary Clinton a real run for her money”, I expect the
article to touch on multiple facets of the campaign. This link to Carly’s
website illustrates the multiple issues and ideas Carly is trying to promote
throughout her campaign that were not touched on in either articles: Carly's Mission
When viewing these articles,
uninformed voters would have strewn ideas of Carly Fiorina’s campaign. I
believe the Fox News article would paint an overzealous picture for her issue
stances and potential. I believe the Politico article would also paint an
inaccurate picture of Carly’s potential in the 2016 presidential race.
http://www.politico.com/story/2015/01/carly-fiorina-in-2016-114354.html
http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2015/04/09/carly-fiorina-why-ex-ceo-could-give-hillary-clinton-run-for-her-money/











